Beyond a Corporate Fad: Employee Engagement
Tuesday, July 5th, 2005The topic of employee engagement has become quite the rage for internal communicators. But, according to Kieron Shaw, head of research at Melcrum Publishing, some practitioners have missed the point. “As more and more companies become obsessed with it, it’s become more fad than fact,” Shaw tells us.
“The concept of employee engagement – a noble ideal about getting employees driven and motivated by what the company is doing and wanting to help it get there – has very quickly been lost in the last couple of years. It’s become a thing rather than an ethos; a product rather than an ideal; and, more often than not, a survey rather than an overall change in the way the business functions (vis-a-vis its relationship with employees).
To illustrate, Shaw draws from a recent research project:
Question: “So you talk about employee engagement being a big thing for you. What are you trying to achieve? What’s your ideal outcome?” (i.e., is it to build trust, to improve customer service, to harness innovation, etc?)
Answer: “Well, this year, I suppose our ideal outcome is to get a better score on question 37 in our Employee Engagement Survey.”
In other words, some people have lost sight of the fact that employee engagement is about making a real impact, not survey results. This is a nuance, albeit an important one, that can be hard to grasp. As a Gold Quill judge, I see it all the time. Successful campaigns aim to “enroll 20% of employees in a new health plan,” or “drive ticket sales by 3%,” not simply “raise awareness” (generic and way overused). There has to be some end… some measurable change in behavior that connects to the business plan or bottom line.
“The Employee Engagement Survey has become such a thing — putting a number (index score) on engagement in the organization, that people have lost sight of the fact that engagement is actually just an idealized state (i.e., motivated, efficient, caring, connected to the business strategy, profit oriented, et al.). It becomes so overwhelming that it just starts being a process (e.g., “C’mon guys, how are we going to shift our engagement score from a 65.7 to at least 68.0?”),” adds Shaw.
Another way to put this: we’ve become intoxicated with the measurement, not with the actions that result from true employee engagement - such as discretionary effort (employees going the extra mile for quality or service). Shaw is blunt on this point, “there’s a lot about this whole topic that people fuddle and mess about – they jump on the bandwagon with the term without really knowing what they’re doing.”
In his session, he outlined key factors that motivate, drive and engage employees, with a special look at senior and front-line leadership. If you were there, and took notes (even mental), please share them here in the comments section.
- Charles Pizzo