Nice Guys Finish…First?
I’ll be gender-neutral in the body of this post, but the quote referenced in my heading, attributed to U.S. baseball coaching legend Leo Durocher, is too well-known to alter for the sake of political correctness.
Leo’s opinion, however, that “Nice Guys Finish Last,” may not be accurate–if a book by Wharton School Publishing is correct. The book, “Moral Intelligence: Enhancing Business Performance & Leadership Success,” by Doug Lennick and Fred Kiel, examines the connection between strong moral principles and business success. According to the authors, the connection is strong between “nice (moral) people” and business success.
Read the book’s first chapter, which is available at the link above. I liked the discussion regarding the relatively greater competitive advantage that you can get with higher “moral intelligence” and “emotional intelligence” compared to “cognitive intelligence” (IQ).
In this post-Enron world, where trust and engagement go hand-in-hand, this concept seems particularly timely and accurate.
Thanks go to Mike Zimet of Dialogue Solutions for passing along the link, and for pointing out some of the article points that he found interesting, including:
Moral intelligence is not just important to effective leadership; it is the “central intelligence” for all humans. Why? It’s because moral intelligence directs our other forms of intelligence to do something worthwhile. Moral intelligence gives our life purpose. Without moral intelligence, we would be able to do things and experience events, but they would lack meaning.
Without moral intelligence, we wouldn’t know why we do what we do — or even what difference our existence makes in the great cosmic scheme of things.
If IABC didn’t care about this topic, we wouldn’t have a Code of Ethics.
August 22nd, 2005 at 3:33 pm
With no intention of questioning the sentiments preceding it, I believe a short pause to examine the underlying logic of the concluding statement, “If IABC didn’t care about this topic, we wouldn’t have a Code of Ethics,” is in order.
Please follow this link and click on “Enron”.
http://www.iit.edu/departments/csep/codes/industry.html
August 22nd, 2005 at 5:42 pm
LOL! Thanks for the reality check, Ron. A code of ethics is only empty words if its principles aren’t followed. So is a marriage vow, a handshake agreement, or a campaign speech. Ethical decision-making and promises kept lead to stronger bonds and greater trust. Empty words lead to mistrust and disengagement. Ask anyone formerly associated with Enron.
August 22nd, 2005 at 8:46 pm
Perhaps there’s hope for me yet.
August 29th, 2005 at 1:11 pm
Here is a link to the US Ethics Resource Center, based in Washington, DC., which calls itself “a nonprofit, nonpartisan educational organization whose vision is a world where individuals and organizations act with integrity.”
Thanks for the link, Judy Gombita.
August 30th, 2005 at 5:07 am
You’re welcome, Tom. Please note that this is a website I recently came across, which was unfamiliar to me (as well as to some colleagues who actively research and make use of ethics resources).
In our print/online newsletter, Communicator, IABC/Toronto placed a great deal of emphasis on the area of ethics a couple of years back. (I also noted this is the theme of an upcoming issue in 2005/2006, which is encouraging to see.) Despite being written and researched a couple of years ago, the vast majority of information remains relevant/websites active. Access them through the online archive of back issues of Communicator as follows:
Quick Picks: A Brief Guide to Online Ethics Resources (primarily Canadian-based websites)
http://toronto.iabc.com/news/communicator/article.asp?year=2003&intArticleId=107
Other archived articles on ethics:
http://toronto.iabc.com/professionaldevelopment/ethics/default.asp