<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: IABC Code of Ethics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.iabc.com/chair/archives/2005/04/14/iabc-code-of-ethics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.iabc.com/chair/archives/2005/04/14/iabc-code-of-ethics/</link>
	<description>A gathering place for professional communicators</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 14:04:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Warren Bickford</title>
		<link>http://blogs.iabc.com/chair/archives/2005/04/14/iabc-code-of-ethics/#comment-1129</link>
		<dc:creator>Warren Bickford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2005 17:49:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.iabc.com/chair/archives/2005/04/14/iabc-code-of-ethics/#comment-1129</guid>
		<description>I took a look at your full comments, Neville, and I agree that the "profession" has never done a good job promoting its various codes of ethics. I won't get into the debate about which code is the preferred code (although you could probably guess). Rather, I think it is important for all communicators to regularly review the code they agreed to follow. As you and I both know, there is rarely much black or white in the world, it is mostly grey. We all need to have a touchstone of sorts to help us wind our way through the complex communication environment. If nothing else, Neville, by openly talking about ethics, it keeps it more top of mind for everyone. 

I invite everyone to stop by the IABC Café and join the discussion. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I took a look at your full comments, Neville, and I agree that the &#8220;profession&#8221; has never done a good job promoting its various codes of ethics. I won&#8217;t get into the debate about which code is the preferred code (although you could probably guess). Rather, I think it is important for all communicators to regularly review the code they agreed to follow. As you and I both know, there is rarely much black or white in the world, it is mostly grey. We all need to have a touchstone of sorts to help us wind our way through the complex communication environment. If nothing else, Neville, by openly talking about ethics, it keeps it more top of mind for everyone. </p>
<p>I invite everyone to stop by the IABC Café and join the discussion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NevOn</title>
		<link>http://blogs.iabc.com/chair/archives/2005/04/14/iabc-code-of-ethics/#comment-1122</link>
		<dc:creator>NevOn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2005 10:40:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.iabc.com/chair/archives/2005/04/14/iabc-code-of-ethics/#comment-1122</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Blueprint ethics code for the profession&lt;/strong&gt;

One thing I've frequently commented about in this blog is ethics in the communication profession. Or, rather, about the lack of an authoritative and cohesive voice that speaks on ethics on behalf of the profession. I've taken my own stand,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Blueprint ethics code for the profession</strong></p>
<p>One thing I&#8217;ve frequently commented about in this blog is ethics in the communication profession. Or, rather, about the lack of an authoritative and cohesive voice that speaks on ethics on behalf of the profession. I&#8217;ve taken my own stand,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
